---
title: "AI Resistance Sorts Your Team. Let the Reds Go"
description: "AI resistance sorts a team by behavior, not skill. The green, orange and red semaphore, 10 red signs, and how to let the reds go, fast and in writing."
url: "https://www.marian.coach/blog/ai-resistance/"
lang: "en"
image: "https://www.marian.coach/images/blog/ai-resistance/infographic.webp"
---

![AI Resistance Sorts Your Team. Let the Reds Go](https://www.marian.coach/images/blog/ai-resistance/infographic.webp)

IgniteTech spent 20% of its payroll teaching people AI. Then it replaced nearly 80% of them.

AI resistance is when people slow down, avoid or quietly undermine an AI rollout. [31% of employees in a 2025 Writer survey](https://writer.com/blog/enterprise-ai-adoption-survey-press-release/) admitted sabotaging their company’s AI strategy. Across 7 companies and 72 teams I’ve worked with, 10 to 35% of people ended up red, the ones who won’t make it through the change.

Not every person will survive AI adoption. It’s the secret rule nobody talks about. Below is how I sort a team, the 10 red signs, and how to let the reds go, fast and in writing.

## IgniteTech’s year of AI Mondays

In early 2023, IgniteTech’s CEO Eric Vaughan decided generative AI was existential for his software company. [“Every single Monday was called ‘AI Monday,’”](https://fortune.com/2025/08/17/ceo-laid-off-80-percent-workforce-ai-sabotage/) he told Fortune. “You couldn’t have customer calls; you couldn’t work on budgets; you had to only work on AI projects.”

The company put 20% of payroll into a mass-learning programme. Fortune’s verdict: “it failed because of mass resistance, even sabotage.” Vaughan: “we got flat-out, ‘Yeah, I’m not going to do this’ resistance.” The technical staff resisted most.

So he replaced nearly 80% of the staff within a year, by Fortune’s count from headcount data, and every division started reporting into the AI organisation. The company says it finished 2024 at near 75% EBITDA.

His own summary: “Changing minds was harder than adding skills.” And then: “I do not recommend that at all.”

The order matches how I work: support first, the exit after. The semaphore below is the person-by-person version of the same decision.

## Sort by behavior, not skill

I sort a team with a simple semaphore. It sorts people by how they behave during the change, not by what they already know.

### Green

They’re fine. They take the tools and keep delivering.

### Orange

Not there yet, and not against it. They get a 3-month trial with support, and firm KPIs as their definition of success.

### Red

The behavior is the problem, mostly toxic or cultural. Let them go.

### Skeptics

A different group, and they’re okay. Keep them close, as they’re smart. A skeptic argues in the room; a red argues in the corridor.

![Marian Kamenistak at the Engineering Leaders Community conference 2026.](https://www.marian.coach/_astro/talk-46.BXvur2s0_iwMHp.webp)

At the Engineering Leaders Community conference 2026.

Gallup’s 2026 data fits the colours. Among people who don’t use AI at work, [46% prefer “to keep doing work the way it is currently done”](https://www.gallup.com/workplace/704252/workplace-separates-adopters-holdouts.aspx), which is orange, and 43% are ethically opposed, which is mostly skeptics. Red is the sabotage that Writer measured.

Where the 10 to 35% lands across those 72 teams depends on the company. The low end is in companies with real processes. The high end is in what I call relationship-based companies, where people learned that politics and bonds pay better than delivering value.

## The 10 red signs I look for

1.  **Politics over output.** More time goes into alliances than into shipping.
2.  **Rumors.** The team hears the news from them first, in their version.
3.  **Yes in the meeting, no after it.** Agrees with the plan, then slows it down.
4.  **Work nobody can see.** No demo, no pull request, no number, always “in progress”.
5.  **Value is who they know.** The relationship is the job, the result is optional.
6.  **Fear as a weapon.** “AI will replace you”, whispered to colleagues.
7.  **The bottleneck by design.** Keeps access and knowledge to themselves.
8.  **Someone else’s name on every miss.** Never their own.
9.  **Arguing the KPIs instead of hitting them.** Orange that turned red.
10.  **Mocking the people who try.** The hackathon becomes a joke for them.

Don’t let output fool you. The Harvard Business School study of [58,542 workers](https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/16-057_d45c0b4f-fa19-49de-8f1b-4b12fe054fea.pdf) found that avoiding one toxic worker is worth more than hiring a superstar: $12,489 in avoided turnover cost, against $5,303 gained from a top-1% performer.

## Say why before you say must

The AI tooling is half the work. The other half is how you bring it to people, which is communication and motivation. Three things worked for me.

![Marian Kamenistak speaking at an engineering leadership event.](https://www.marian.coach/_astro/talk-38.BcxUtQok_1jdwk.webp)

Speaking at an engineering leadership event.

### Say why, inside and outside

Tell the team why we do AI, and tell the outside world the same story. Duolingo’s CEO published an “AI-first” memo in April 2025 and got a public backlash. His own verdict, [weeks later](https://fortune.com/2025/08/18/duolingo-ceo-admits-controversial-ai-memo-did-not-give-enough-context-insists-company-never-laid-off-full-time-employees/): “This was on me. I did not give enough context.”

He isn’t alone. Only [22% of employees say their organisation has communicated a clear plan](https://www.gallup.com/workplace/691643/work-nearly-doubled-two-years.aspx) for using AI. Part of orange is a leadership gap.

### Prepare the materials first

Guides, examples and access are ready before anyone asks.

### Run a hackathon early

People build something themselves in the first weeks, instead of watching a demo. In March 2023 Zapier [“paused all work for a week and ran an AI Hackathon”](https://zapier.com/blog/how-zapier-rolled-out-ai/). Weekly AI use went from [just under 10% of people to over 50% in one week](https://moderncto.io/wade-foster/), and today 97% of the team uses AI day to day.

## Where to draw the hard line

The hardest version I know: a company gave every member of every business department 3 months to work in Claude Desktop, with predefined plugins per role, Skills, connections and data sources. Whoever wasn’t there after 3 months was out in one day.

It worked. 11 people from the business side left, 27% of them.

Coinbase went faster. Brian Armstrong told engineers to [at least onboard to the AI coding tools by the end of the week](https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/22/coinbase-ceo-explains-why-he-fired-engineers-who-didnt-try-ai-immediately/), then held a Saturday call with the few who hadn’t. Those without a good reason were let go. A few weeks later he posted that about [40% of Coinbase’s daily code was AI-generated](https://www.theblock.co/post/369460/brian-armstrong-coinbase-ai).

The other side deserves a fair hearing. Klarna’s CEO admitted that in its AI push [“cost unfortunately seems to have been a too predominant evaluation factor”](https://www.customerexperiencedive.com/news/klarna-reinvests-human-talent-customer-service-AI-chatbot/747586/), and the result was lower quality. Of the leaders who cut staff after introducing AI, [55% admitted mistakes in their redundancy choices](https://hrreview.co.uk/hr-news/strategy-news/ai-regret-redundancies-got-them-wrong/381820).

That’s why the line comes after the support, not instead of it. Three months with materials, a hackathon and firm KPIs is generous.

## How to let a red go

The same rules work for a red engineer and for a wrong AI executive. The behavior is the problem, so the exit is about behavior too. This isn’t legal advice; check the steps with your employment lawyer.

### Write the behavior down

Collect dated examples against the red signs above. A feeling doesn’t survive the conversation, a list of dates does.

### Give orange one honest chance, in writing

The 3-month trial with firm KPIs is fair, and in Czechia it’s also the law. To end a contract for poor results, the employee must have had [a written request to fix them in the last 12 months, and reasonable time to do it](https://www.zakonyprolidi.cz/cs/2006-262) (§ 52 f).

### Once it’s red, move fast

The HBS study found that exposure to a toxic colleague has a cumulative effect: the longer it lasts, the more damage it does. Accenture’s CEO called the same move [“exiting on a compressed timeline”](https://fortune.com/2025/09/27/accenture-865-million-reinvention-exiting-people-ai-skills/) for people where reskilling isn’t a viable path.

### Prefer an agreement

A written agreement ends the contract on the day you both choose (§ 49). Notice for poor results or breaches is at least 1 month (§ 51), and statutory severance of 1 to 3 months’ pay applies only to organisational reasons (§ 67). Do the math before the conversation: put a fair package next to the cost of one more quarter of red.

### Tell the team the same day

One sentence on why, one on what changes, and who owns the work now. Research on change communication finds that rumors [“flourish in a climate of uncertainty”](https://doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291099-050X%28199823%2F24%2937%3A3%2F4%3C295%3A%3AAID-HRM10%3E3.0.CO%3B2-3), and the negative ones outnumber the positive. Don’t leave a silence for them to fill.

### Take the work back

Name the new owner that day, and keep the skeptics close. Then look at what the role should be next: it may be two days a week of the right person, as I argue in [Chief AI Officer Salary: Buy Two Days, Not Five](https://www.marian.coach/blog/chief-ai-officer-salary/).

Who on your team is red right now, and how many more weeks will you pay for it?

If you want help sorting the team and running the rollout, that’s [my fractional CTO and Chief AI Officer work](https://www.marian.coach/fractional-cto/).

## Frequently asked

### What is AI resistance?

+

AI resistance is when people slow down, avoid or quietly undermine an AI rollout at work. It ranges from honest doubt to refusing the tools and talking colleagues out of them. Doubt argued in the open is useful; the quiet version is a behavior problem, not a skills gap.

### How many employees resist AI adoption?

+

In a 2025 Writer survey of US employees already using generative AI, 31% admitted sabotaging their company's AI strategy. Gallup found in 2026 that among people who don't use AI, 46% prefer to keep working the way they do and 43% are ethically opposed. Across 7 companies and 72 teams I've worked with, 10 to 35% of people ended up red.

### Should you fire employees who refuse to use AI?

+

Not first. Support comes first: a clear why, materials, a hackathon, then a 3-month trial with firm KPIs for anyone who isn't there yet. People whose behavior stays toxic after that, the reds, should go, quickly and in writing. Skeptics who argue openly are worth keeping.

### How do you let an employee go in Czechia?

+

The cleanest way is a written agreement under § 49 of the Labour Code, which ends the contract on the agreed day. Notice for poor results needs a written request to fix them within the last 12 months first (§ 52 f), and runs at least one month. Statutory severance applies only to organisational reasons. Check the steps with an employment lawyer.

### How do you reduce AI resistance?

+

Say why, the same way inside and outside the company, prepare the materials before anyone asks, and run a hackathon early. Zapier paused all work for a week of AI hackathon and weekly AI users went from under 10% to over 50%. Then sort the rest by behavior and act on red.

Fractional CTO

## Bring senior engineering leadership in — without a full-time hire.

From €1,000 a man-day in a quarterly package, €1,200 on demand. No prepayment: I invoice monthly, only when we hit that month's goals. Past clients: Jablotron, Eurowag, Kosik, Dr Max, Pure Storage.

[See pricing →](https://www.marian.coach/fractional-cto/)

ELC community

## Hiring engineering leaders in Czechia?

ELC gets you about 10 vetted intros for one role within 2 weeks, from a community of 3,300+ engineering leaders in Czechia, Slovakia and Poland.

[Send me the role →](https://www.engineeringleaders.io/hire-engineers-czech-republic/?utm_source=marian-coach&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=cross-property&utm_content=fallback-en-hire#start)

## Read next

-   [![Chief AI Officer Salary: Buy Two Days, Not Five](https://www.marian.coach/images/blog/chief-ai-officer-salary/infographic.webp)
    
    ### Chief AI Officer Salary: Buy Two Days, Not Five
    
    A Chief AI Officer costs $1.87M at large US firms and about €194K a year to employ in Prague. Five AI leadership seats, four markets, and the full bill.
    
    18 October 2026 · By Marian
    
    Read →
    
    
    
    ](https://www.marian.coach/blog/chief-ai-officer-salary/)
-   [![Wide shot of a 1:1 community mentoring session in an atrium, two people in armchairs at a round table.](https://www.marian.coach/_astro/mentoring-05.BrINwYEC_Z1otGeW.webp)
    
    ### Director of AI: Research, Product or Transformation Seat
    
    Director of AI can mean a research lead, a product AI builder or an enterprise adoption owner. Who each reports to, what it pays, and what to negotiate.
    
    9 October 2026 · By Marian
    
    Read →
    
    
    
    ](https://www.marian.coach/director-of-ai-role/)
-   [![Marian Kamenistak in a grey blazer against a teal curtain, warm smile.](https://www.marian.coach/_astro/portrait-formal-smile-hero.DyHbyQ-m_12qtWF.webp)
    
    ### Head of AI: What the Role Owns, and Who Gets the Seat
    
    Head of AI: what the seat owns, the two roads into it, how it differs from Head of Engineering, and the contract to sign before you accept the title.
    
    9 October 2026 · By Marian
    
    Read →
    
    
    
    ](https://www.marian.coach/head-of-ai-role/)

### New posts, straight to your inbox.

Your emailSubscribe

You're on it.

Nothing hits your inbox today. First send goes out once the list is live, and you're already on it.

[Connect on LinkedIn →](https://www.linkedin.com/in/mariankamenistak/)[See the free tools →](https://www.marian.coach/ai-coaching-tools/)

## Structured data

```json
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"ProfessionalService","name":"Marian Kamenistak | Engineering Leadership Mentoring","url":"https://www.marian.coach/blog/ai-resistance/","image":"https://www.marian.coach/images/blog/ai-resistance/infographic.webp","description":"AI resistance sorts a team by behavior, not skill. The green, orange and red semaphore, 10 red signs, and how to let the reds go, fast and in writing.","serviceType":["Engineering leadership mentoring","Engineering manager coaching","CTO coaching","Fractional CTO","Leadership development for software engineers"],"hasOfferCatalog":{"@type":"OfferCatalog","name":"Engineering leadership mentoring and advisory","itemListElement":[{"@type":"Offer","itemOffered":{"@type":"Service","name":"1:1 engineering leadership mentoring","description":"One-to-one mentoring for engineering leaders from Staff Engineer to CTO. 60-minute sessions, weekly or bi-weekly.","url":"https://www.marian.coach/pricing/"}},{"@type":"Offer","itemOffered":{"@type":"Service","name":"Engineering manager coaching","description":"Coaching for first-time and experienced engineering managers: delegation, performance, hiring, team scaling.","url":"https://www.marian.coach/engineering-manager-mentor/"}},{"@type":"Offer","itemOffered":{"@type":"Service","name":"CTO and VP Engineering mentoring","description":"Mentoring for CTOs, VPs of Engineering and Heads of Engineering running 30-200 person organisations.","url":"https://www.marian.coach/cto-mentor/"}},{"@type":"Offer","itemOffered":{"@type":"Service","name":"Mentor in Residence","description":"A dedicated onsite mentor for your engineering organisation, booked by the quarter.","url":"https://www.marian.coach/mentor-in-residence/"}},{"@type":"Offer","itemOffered":{"@type":"Service","name":"Fractional CTO","description":"Part-time CTO engagements for companies without a full-time technology leader.","url":"https://www.marian.coach/fractional-cto/"}}]},"telephone":"+420 736 519 879","email":"marian@marian.coach","sameAs":["https://www.linkedin.com/in/mariankamenistak/","https://www.youtube.com/@engineeringleaders","https://github.com/marian-kamenistak","https://www.engineeringleaders.io/","https://www.elc-conference.io/","https://www.marianslist.com/","https://www.mentoringhub.io/"],"address":{"@type":"PostalAddress","streetAddress":"Varšavská 715/36, Vinohrady","addressLocality":"Praha 2","postalCode":"12000","addressCountry":"CZ"},"geo":{"@type":"GeoCoordinates","latitude":50.0734418,"longitude":14.4385757},"openingHoursSpecification":[{"@type":"OpeningHoursSpecification","dayOfWeek":["Monday","Tuesday","Wednesday","Thursday","Friday"],"opens":"09:00","closes":"17:00"}],"priceRange":"329–395 EUR","areaServed":[{"@type":"Place","name":"Europe"},{"@type":"Country","name":"Czechia"},{"@type":"Country","name":"Slovakia"},{"@type":"Country","name":"Poland"},{"@type":"Place","name":"North America"}]}
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Person","@id":"https://www.marian.coach/#person","name":"Marian Kamenistak","url":"https://www.marian.coach/","image":"https://www.marian.coach/images/blog/ai-resistance/infographic.webp","jobTitle":["Engineering Leadership Mentor","Fractional CTO & Chief AI Officer","Founder, Engineering Leaders Community","Engineering Manager Coach","CTO Coach","Keynote Speaker"],"hasOccupation":[{"@type":"Occupation","name":"Engineering Leadership Mentor"},{"@type":"Occupation","name":"Fractional CTO & Chief AI Officer"}],"worksFor":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Engineering Leaders Community","url":"https://www.engineeringleaders.io/"},"alumniOf":[{"@type":"Organization","name":"Mews"},{"@type":"Organization","name":"Databricks"}],"knowsLanguage":["English","Czech","Slovak"],"knowsAbout":["Engineering leadership","Engineering management","Scaling engineering teams","CTO mentoring","Engineering org design","VP of Engineering role","Engineering director role","CTPO role","Team lead development","Staff engineer career path","Fractional CTO engagements","AI-assisted engineering leadership","Conference keynotes on engineering leadership","Panel moderation","Podcast guest — engineering leadership"],"homeLocation":{"@type":"Place","name":"Prague, Czechia"},"sameAs":["https://www.linkedin.com/in/mariankamenistak/","https://www.youtube.com/@engineeringleaders","https://github.com/marian-kamenistak","https://www.engineeringleaders.io/","https://www.elc-conference.io/","https://www.marianslist.com/","https://www.mentoringhub.io/","https://www.crunchbase.com/person/marian-kamenistak","https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q140488098","https://developers.mews.com/author/marian/","https://startupdisrupt.com/speakers/marian-kamenistak/","https://theorg.com/org/engineering-leaders-community/org-chart/marian-kamenistak"]}
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"WebPage","url":"https://www.marian.coach/blog/ai-resistance/","name":"AI Resistance Sorts Your Team. Let the Reds Go","inLanguage":"en","dateModified":"2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z"}
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"FAQPage","inLanguage":"en","mainEntity":[{"@type":"Question","name":"What is AI resistance?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"AI resistance is when people slow down, avoid or quietly undermine an AI rollout at work. It ranges from honest doubt to refusing the tools and talking colleagues out of them. Doubt argued in the open is useful; the quiet version is a behavior problem, not a skills gap."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How many employees resist AI adoption?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"In a 2025 Writer survey of US employees already using generative AI, 31% admitted sabotaging their company's AI strategy. Gallup found in 2026 that among people who don't use AI, 46% prefer to keep working the way they do and 43% are ethically opposed. Across 7 companies and 72 teams I've worked with, 10 to 35% of people ended up red."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"Should you fire employees who refuse to use AI?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Not first. Support comes first: a clear why, materials, a hackathon, then a 3-month trial with firm KPIs for anyone who isn't there yet. People whose behavior stays toxic after that, the reds, should go, quickly and in writing. Skeptics who argue openly are worth keeping."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do you let an employee go in Czechia?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"The cleanest way is a written agreement under § 49 of the Labour Code, which ends the contract on the agreed day. Notice for poor results needs a written request to fix them within the last 12 months first (§ 52 f), and runs at least one month. Statutory severance applies only to organisational reasons. Check the steps with an employment lawyer."}},{"@type":"Question","name":"How do you reduce AI resistance?","acceptedAnswer":{"@type":"Answer","text":"Say why, the same way inside and outside the company, prepare the materials before anyone asks, and run a hackathon early. Zapier paused all work for a week of AI hackathon and weekly AI users went from under 10% to over 50%. Then sort the rest by behavior and act on red."}}]}
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BlogPosting","headline":"AI Resistance Sorts Your Team. Let the Reds Go","description":"AI resistance sorts a team by behavior, not skill. The green, orange and red semaphore, 10 red signs, and how to let the reds go, fast and in writing.","inLanguage":"en","articleSection":"consulting","datePublished":"2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z","dateModified":"2026-10-18T00:00:00.000Z","author":{"@id":"https://www.marian.coach/#person"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Marian Kamenistak","url":"https://www.marian.coach/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://www.marian.coach/favicon-192x192.webp","width":192,"height":192}},"image":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://www.marian.coach/images/blog/ai-resistance/infographic.webp"},"mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://www.marian.coach/blog/ai-resistance/"},"keywords":"consulting, ai, leadership, hiring","wordCount":1489,"timeRequired":"PT7M","isAccessibleForFree":true}
{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https://www.marian.coach/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Blog","item":"https://www.marian.coach/blog/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"AI Resistance Sorts Your Team. Let the Reds Go","item":"https://www.marian.coach/blog/ai-resistance/"}]}
```
